Notes and Agreements
As the OSCAL Foundation's FedRAMP Technology Focus Group (TFG) reaches agreements as to the path forward, they are captured here. This is a work in progress. Once the group reaches an appropriate milestone, this will be consolidated and re-organized into more consumable guidance.
DRAFT - Please review and provide feedback. Self-register via Login to leave comments.
See Taxonomy
KSI Approach
-
KSI Statement Analysis
- Identify KSI goal(s)
-
KSI Data Requirements:
- Intent: A simple, unambiguous status. Typically Pass/Fail
- Decision Point: Sampling or full coverage?
- Identify evidence to collect in support of KSI goal(s)
- Define evidence interpretation
- Evidence type (count, true/false, setting)
- Collection frequency
- Evidence fidelity
- Correlation
- Thresholds
- Could be more granular than just pass/fail
- Example: Satisfactory, Degraded, Critical
-
Organizational Considerations:
- Action Triggers: Define the triggers for that system/org
- Define required action(s) when triggered
- Action Triggers: Define the triggers for that system/org
-
KSI Techical Collection Approach
- Identify all evidence source/component
- Identify the source format(s)
- Define centralized evidence collection target
- Define the automation required to acquire evidence from each source/component and deliver to centralied collection target
- Decision Point: Evidence delivered raw or normalized?
- Identify all evidence source/component
-
KSI Technical Interpretation Approach
- Apply data requirements/thresholds to produce Findings
- Findings are continuously updating as new data is received and analyzed
- Raise action triggers when appropriate
- Apply data requirements/thresholds to produce Findings
No comments to display
No comments to display