Skip to main content

Notes and Agreements

As the OSCAL Foundation's FedRAMP Technology Focus Group (TFG) reaches agreements as to the path forward, they are captured here. This is a work in progress. Once the group reaches an appropriate milestone, this will be consolidated and re-organized into more consumable guidance.

DRAFT - Please review and provide feedback. Self-register via Login to leave comments.


See Taxonomy

See Guiding Principles


KSI Approach

  • KSI Statement Analysis

    • Identify KSI goal(s)
  • KSI Data Requirements:

    • Intent: A simple, unambiguous status. Typically Pass/Fail
    • Decision Point: Sampling or full coverage?
    • Identify evidence to collect in support of KSI goal(s)
    • Define evidence interpretation
      • Evidence type (count, true/false, setting)
      • Collection frequency
      • Evidence fidelity
      • Correlation
      • Thresholds
        • Could be more granular than just pass/fail
        • Example: Satisfactory, Degraded, Critical
  • Organizational Considerations:

    • Action Triggers: Define the triggers for that system/org
      • Define required action(s) when triggered
  • KSI Techical Collection Approach

    • Identify all evidence source/component
      • Identify the source format(s)
    • Define centralized evidence collection target
    • Define the automation required to acquire evidence from each source/component and deliver to centralied collection target
      • Decision Point: Evidence delivered raw or normalized?
  • KSI Technical Interpretation Approach

    • Apply data requirements/thresholds to produce Findings
      • Findings are continuously updating as new data is received and analyzed
    • Raise action triggers when appropriate